Video

Here it is from the YouTube channel of Abdi Media

Watch it on the Abdi Media YouTube channel.

Such actions take time, and we must maintain our credibility.

As a fighter Iranian, I do not want him to get involved in issues that are beyond control or that contradict the position of a constitutional monarch.

During the years when I was alongside Reza Pahlavi, he was a democratic individual and did not fight for the restoration of the "monarchy".

The Islamic Republic is not on the verge of collapse.

The sidelining of Ayatollah Khamenei has "discredited" (made ambiguous or tainted) the concept of Velayat (Guardianship of the Jurist).

All the levers of power are in the hands of this 15-20 percent, and they run the country.

The third Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran, who was targeted in the recent attacks by the United States and Israel. How was a unit called "Intelligence-Operations" formed?

Neither the Islamic Republic nor the US government wants to return to the battlefield.

The attack on Iran was against international law.

Mehrdad Khansari: The removal (or sidelining) of Ayatollah Khamenei has created a situation in which, if our nation is vigilant...

Mehrdad Khansari: The nature of the current dissatisfaction of the people is different from the past.

The people wanted more political freedom, which was not available at that time.

The Shah intervened in two areas: matters related to foreign policy and military matters and the defense of the country.

During the time of the Shah, dissatisfaction could be curbed by providing financial facilities to the people.

Mehrdad Khansari: Our country, at the time when Mohammad Reza Shah came to the throne, was a poor country.

It is very clear that the Islamic Republic is at one of the most sensitive historical junctures. Therefore, we are going to discuss an issue that is important for the future of Iran, and the topic of our conversation is the structure of power in Iran. We know that after the attacks that took place in recent months, and after the killing of Ayatollah Khamenei and the transfer of leadership in a very strange and extraordinary process to his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, many now believe that the Islamic Republic has entered its third generation. Although to this day, we have not seen any live voice, image, photo, or even a live signature from the new leader. Has Iran entered the era of a military-security government? And can the new architecture of power stabilize the Islamic Republic system and the nascent system of Mojtaba Khamenei, or will new crises arise?

Mehrdad Khansari: The biggest weakness of the Islamic Republic is the lack of development and the creation of public dissatisfaction.

The skill he had in construction, he did not have in "crisis management".

The members of the force command office and the producer of this video are apparently unaware of the picture of the founding leader of the Islamic Republic, which is a legal requirement.

If the government continues its practice of raids, imprisonments, and house arrests, what we were worried about happening through a foreign attack will instead occur through "social collapse."

We are in an emergency situation in which the law is not observed.

Hossein Bayat: When the leader of the Islamic Republic is assassinated in the first second of the war, it means we are naturally in an emergency situation.

The theoretical foundations of the Islamic Republic are fraught with conflict and contradiction.

If there is to be a discussion of "transition," then the issue of "war" — which has already been defeated — must be raised again.

I want to speak on Abdi Media about one of the most complex and tense arenas of Iranian politics — a space between war and freedom, between the opposition and power, and between truth and the politics of commerce; about a society that has for years been suspended between anger, fear, hope, revenge, freedom, and collapse, and now stands at a point where it is simultaneously afraid of war, afraid of the continuation of the status quo, and afraid of a future of which it still has no clear image. In years when Iran is simultaneously entangled in internal crisis, external pressure, the threat of war, and the collapse of public trust, great questions remain — questions whose answers many might find important to know: Who truly speaks for Iran?

If you had understood, you wouldn't have relied one bit on foreign interference!

The binary of "people vs. government" is wrong and has led to war.

It cannot be said that those who are involved in the country's defense mechanism are necessarily the same people who suppressed the people in January

Watch on the Abdi Media YouTube channel.

Outside the country, the level of violence has risen so high that anyone who speaks "anti-war" cannot feel safe.

Under these circumstances, someone like Reza Pahlavi can become "sacralized."

They Lack the Authenticity, Foundations, and Ideals of a Genuine Revolution

The Pahlavi model of governance is based on a paternalistic and patriarchal style of rule.

Free speech lives in safety

This entire affair of war is a "business."

In no movement have we had such facilitation for the issue of mass killing.

This creature and her entire campaign view the existence of the Iranian human through a consumerist lens.

In December, an additional layer was added to the government's repression, and that was due to the role played by Pahlavi.

The "dead ends" were translated into "insoluble" issues for the people

We need people who can stand against the waves.
 

The path ahead does not lead to liberation.
 

An excerpt from the documentary Khorramshahr by Ali Hamid.

Individual leadership is not desirable because such an event occurred in the Islamic Revolution.

From the YouTube channel of Abdi Media

The strength of revolutions is proportional to the strength of their leaders.

The waves of such a war are still on their way, and they will give rise to an “economic tsunami” in Iran.

Reza Pahlavi turned his back on the “New Covenant” that he had previously presented.

Given the course of events in the country, it is natural that this government has no choice but to leave.
 

The Green Movement is the first movement in which people took to the streets for their civil rights without being called by the clergy.

Mohsen Sazegara: The slogan “Woman, Life, Freedom” was a gift from our Kurdish compatriots, and this slogan is not accidental.

This revolution remained unfinished, but it achieved one of its demands, which is the issue of compulsory dress code and women’s rights.

Mohsen Sazegara: Any process in which various segments of society, not just a single class, collectively enter the political arena and demand a change of government is a revolutionary process.
 

He created a suitable opportunity for religious opponents who were also ideologically equipped.
 

From the Abdi Media YouTube channel.

Mohammad Reza Pahlavi dissolved all the parties.

Mohsen Sazegara: There were two main disputes with the Shah; they said he was an American puppet and that he did not implement Islamic jurisprudential rulings.

I came to the conclusion that the problems of the Islamic Republic lie in clerical Islam (jurisprudential Islam).

During my time in Evin Prison, I became aware of the rumors about Lajevardi being a “butcher.”

Mr. Khamenei used to say that the magazine *Kiyan* was a “dinosaur egg” and that a monster would emerge from it.
 

Mohsen Sazegara: I was working as an advisor at the Iran Data Processing Company; Mr. Khamenei issued an order from above that “so-and-so should no longer be there!”

The confrontation with the United States and Israel was the axis of the Islamic Republic’s foreign policy.

The national, freedom-seeking, and pro-democracy opposition must have a national media outlet; otherwise, they will fall behind.

During the events of December (the “Dey protests”), Reza Pahlavi played a significant role in helping the Islamic Republic deal with its opponents.

If the Islamic Republic wants to survive, only the word “Islamic” should remain in its name.

Mr. Mojtaba's situation must also be clarified. It needs to be addressed. People cannot live with an unseen leader.

Religious governments always justify their political changes.

It seems that even the reformists have come to accept Mojtaba’s leadership.

He changed his approach based on the will and request of the sponsors

Farhad Salmanpour Zahir and his escape from Branch 33 of the Tehran Public and Revolutionary  

From Abdi Media's YouTube channel

Claiming that the Pahlavi era has ties to some members of the Revolutionary Guards is a joke.

There is no basis for their return

America never seeks regime change in Iran

I don't think that the split and disagreement in the deep layers of the government will lead to collapse

If the policies of the Islamic Republic continue, some Iranians abroad will not remain silent.

If they repeat their past actions, protests broader than those of “Deymah” (January protests) will occur in Iran.
 

Hassan Etemadi: The children of senior officials mostly live outside Iran and have undergone many changes.

They understand that it is not possible to govern a country based on a set of ideological and religious frameworks.

Hassan Etmadi: The Islamic Republic has been successful in missile production activities

Can a miracle create fundamental changes in the structure?

Hereditary rule is one of the hallmarks of authoritarian governments.

A government came to power that paid no attention to cultural and social issues and was solely focused on gaining political power.

Now on Abdi Media's YouTube channel

Did you think he expressed such views based on his own personal opinion?

However, Sabeti does not explicitly state that the resolution of the Supreme National Security Council bears the signature and approval of either the second or the third leader.

I wanted to say that now the Sheikh explicitly claims, according to statements by Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei's son-in-law, that the Ayatollah was, in some instances, influenced by targeted infiltration!

Ambiguity regarding the manner of governing Iran after the Islamic Republic has existed for the West since the early days of the revolution and, as it appears, continues to persist.

My Dialogue and Analysis regarding the Islamabad Negotiations

Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, an opponent of the Pahlavi regime and a fighter in the 1957 Revolution, was accompanying Ayatollah Khomeini on the French aircraft.

In another conversation following the announcement of Seyyed Mojtaba Khamenei as the third Leader of the Islamic Republic.

The scenario of an agreement with the Islamic Republic is on the table

It is not possible to simply accept the statements of the warring parties