Home/Special noteInterview with "Professor Mojtaba Al-Sultani Al-Muslemin "Mohsen Borhani," Attorney at Law, with "Cafe Khabar" Reveals Interesting and Thought-Provoking PointsRead3 minutes -Thursday 2024/10/17 - 19:54News Code:4103ShareVideo file "Professor Borhani" explicitly claims that the actions of seizure and sealing by "FARAJA" and other officers are not based on judicial orders, which is pure falsehood.At the very least, what are the verbal orders from the head of the judiciary and their emphases that can be tracked with minimal research in cyberspace? And even assuming the impossibility of the truth of this claim, is the judiciary unable to prevent actions by the Minister of Interior and "FARAJA"?"Professor Borhani" himself has requested in a tweet from the Prosecutor General of the Islamic Revolution Court in Tehran to address a complaint against the Minister of Interior in the government employees' prosecutor's office. However, "Professor" cleverly avoided answering the question here.Wouldn't it be better if he himself stated what happened to that baseless complaint? No details are needed; the general outline suffices. Is that too difficult?Is the story of this complaint similar to the complaint from "Fars News Agency," whose outcome was not informally communicated with noise?"Professor Borhani" has filed a petition with the Administrative Justice Court regarding the ruling issued against his suspension at the university. What was the result of this complaint and petition in the appellate branch of the Administrative Justice Court (according to the new law of the Administrative Justice Court)? Can he not disclose this as well?"Professor Borhani" claims with "FARAJA" and the Ministry of Interior's signed resolutions on the Headquarters of Hijab and Chastity that if he complains because the documents are classified, he will be sentenced to imprisonment. Many esteemed scholars in the seminary and universities find this statement unlikely; because as a concerned citizen with social responsibility and civil and legal activism, it is sufficient to reflect the general provisions and decisions of the Minister of Interior and the deputy commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces in "FARAJA" and the President of the National Security Council to the public panel of the Administrative Justice Court and demand their annulment without the need to provide any classified documents, thus avoiding concerns about their criminal consequences.According to the order of the Deputy Head of the Administrative Justice Court in charge of public and specialized panels, pursuant to Note 2 of Article 20 of the Administrative Justice Court Law, records will be directly forwarded from the Ministry of Interior.Additionally, "Professor," who refers to the old (but not repealed) law of the National Security Council and considers that council an advisory council, would be better served by requesting the annulment of its resolutions from the public panel of the Administrative Justice Court with the same legal interpretation and understanding. However, it seems he has made the same mistake that the former Minister of Intelligence, Communications, and Information Technology did, as I mentioned in a note to him (https://t.me/AbdiMedia/35006). It is sufficient to adhere to the powers granted by the Supreme National Security Council in implementing the latest part of Article 176 of the Constitution and with the approval of the Supreme Leader, or to file a complaint with the Administrative Justice Court during the bill exchange stage for the court to consider, and it will be included in the public or specialized panel's ruling."Professor Borhani," please also disclose the result of your personal complaint to the Administrative Justice Court.However, the most interesting reaction from "Professor Borhani" was his response to the interviewer's question regarding the outcome of his trial and prosecution in the Special Clergy Court, which he evaded with cunning and a bitter laugh.Truly, why does "Professor" not want to at least inform the general public about the initial ruling of the Special Clergy Court after all the noise and the release of parts of the prosecutor's indictment, etc.?Is the dissemination of information and the shouts and criticisms selective?These questions, along with other unanswered questions, remain. Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.Sign UpComming Up Next Republication - The text of the Supreme Judicial Council's directive dated December 19, 1984, to all courts and prosecutor's offices in Iran regarding the acceptance of attorneys.خواندن 1 minute This “costly calm” was the best possible condition for completing the internal security ring.خواندن 1 minute When and under what conditions does the internet connect? The answer is on the street, at sea, and in the sky.خواندن 4 minutes The policy of reclaiming the street: from control to the beginning of a tough crackdownخواندن 3 minutes Trump, Iran Street, and the Politics of Deal-Making; How Important is Democracy?خواندن 5 minutesMost ReadMemories of Akbar Hashemi - February 20, 2000 - Meeting with Abdullah Jasbi and Concerns About Election ResultsMovie / Where is Commander Morteza Talaie?Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 10 - The two-person political negotiations with Vaez Tabasi continued until he was escorted to Tehran, where Hashemi apparently decided to seriously participate in the sixth parliamentary elections.The records of the recent periods of the Islamic Council showed that the parliament is not in charge of affairs and cannot interfere or pass resolutions on the authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces at any level, let alone supervise.What will be the future of Iran with the announced candidates for the presidential election? / Conversation with Dr. Taghi Azad AramakiCan I feel tired with you?A Basiji veterinarian was appointed head of the health network instead of an otolaryngologist.Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 5 - The meeting of the senior managers of the judiciary with Hashemi Rafsanjani and their complaint about the neglect of Hashemi Shahroudi, the new head of the judiciary, continues.Memories of Akbar Hashemi - 1999 September 7 - In continuation of the efforts of the late Vaez Tabasi, who used to encourage Hashemi to participate in the elections in frequent meetings, this time he also met with Hashemi.Akbar Hashemi's memories - 1999 September 9 - Continued visits to the belongings, buildings and works of Astan Quds