Confirmation of Abdi media's note / A little patience, I "still" do not want to regard him as part of the psychological warfare project for managing the recent protests through the "pen" and "words."

Esteemed Professor, Hojjat al-Islam and Muslims Dr. Mohsen Borhani,

Wishing you a year full of divine blessings and lights,

I have seen your incomplete and very delayed explanation regarding a matter that had engaged many media outlets and your followers for a time, and it was later revealed to be untrue.

However, more serious questions remain.

Abdimedia had addressed the core issue of that publication at the time and questioned the letter's content and style in an article, which you and your esteemed followers reviewed and can still refer to for further information.

At the height of those rumors, without clear and explicit explanations, you surfed the wave and recently, when you accused me of being unfaithful in a WhatsApp group and said that "know that both my dismissal from the University of Tehran was correct and still ongoing, as well as the security case and the Judiciary's correspondence with the Bar Association to revoke my license, meaning all three actions that should be taken, have been executed.”

Now, it has been proven that all data received by me and the reports published by Abdimedia are accurate.

I am sharing the entire recent chat exchanges here for the information of Abdimedia's followers and emphasize that "for now," I do not consider you, based on the received data, as part of the psychological warfare and public management project regarding protests.

I am neither seeking to increase my followers nor do I believe in incorrect and sensational news. It is likely fair to acknowledge that, unlike some opportunists, I do not wish to make your dismissal from the university, the revocation of your license, or your imprisonment into media fodder and entertainment; neither for you nor for anyone else.

I hope you will respond to the reasons behind the debate with Sheikh Jalil Mohbi, the lack of "tangible" judicial and non-judicial restrictions despite all the criticisms "which are necessary," unlike your other colleagues, and the decision and encouragement to participate in security cases, particularly in the case of Rouhollah Ajmian "from a certain point" and the fate of the correspondence from the Director General of Professional Services at the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Department of the Judiciary regarding your license, "by that wise part of the ruling system."

Any explanations you provide will be published in adherence to media ethics.

If you wish. Truly, only the truthful are saved.

Best regards,