Home/Special noteSupplementary - Very important - What will happen if the Administrative Justice Court does not annul the Ministry of Interior's directive?Read1 minute -Saturday 2024/09/28 - 20:59News Code:4564Share According to Article 84 of the Administrative Justice Court Law:Matters that fall under the jurisdiction of the General Assembly of the Court, as per the law, are initially referred to specialized panels composed of at least 15 judges from the Court.Now, it must first be seen whether the specialized panel in question will reject the incoming complaints at this stage, or, as per the conditions set forth in this article, will refer the matter to the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court for annulment of the directive or sections thereof based on the arguments presented by the complainants, according to Article 88 of the Administrative Justice Court Law.In any case, attention must be paid to:With the review of the Administrative Justice Court according to the amended Article 93 of the Administrative Justice Law, the decision of the specialized panel and potentially the General Assembly of the Administrative Justice Court regarding the "annulment or non-annulment" of the Ministry of Interior's directive will be valid and binding for the judicial and administrative authorities of the Islamic Republic.In clearer terms, if the Administrative Justice Court does not annul this directive in its entirety or in parts, then the Ministry of Interior will proceed with greater authority and legal backing, which will also serve as a reference for all governmental judicial and administrative bodies.Therefore, we must wait for the publication of the decision from the specialized panel or the General Assembly of the Court on the Court's website and in the official newspaper, or from the respected complainants. Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.Sign UpComming Up Next Republication - The text of the Supreme Judicial Council's directive dated December 19, 1984, to all courts and prosecutor's offices in Iran regarding the acceptance of attorneys.خواندن 1 minute This “costly calm” was the best possible condition for completing the internal security ring.خواندن 1 minute When and under what conditions does the internet connect? The answer is on the street, at sea, and in the sky.خواندن 4 minutes The policy of reclaiming the street: from control to the beginning of a tough crackdownخواندن 3 minutes Trump, Iran Street, and the Politics of Deal-Making; How Important is Democracy?خواندن 5 minutesMost ReadMemories of Akbar Hashemi - February 20, 2000 - Meeting with Abdullah Jasbi and Concerns About Election ResultsMovie / Where is Commander Morteza Talaie?Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 10 - The two-person political negotiations with Vaez Tabasi continued until he was escorted to Tehran, where Hashemi apparently decided to seriously participate in the sixth parliamentary elections.The records of the recent periods of the Islamic Council showed that the parliament is not in charge of affairs and cannot interfere or pass resolutions on the authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces at any level, let alone supervise.What will be the future of Iran with the announced candidates for the presidential election? / Conversation with Dr. Taghi Azad AramakiCan I feel tired with you?A Basiji veterinarian was appointed head of the health network instead of an otolaryngologist.Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 5 - The meeting of the senior managers of the judiciary with Hashemi Rafsanjani and their complaint about the neglect of Hashemi Shahroudi, the new head of the judiciary, continues.Memories of Akbar Hashemi - 1999 September 7 - In continuation of the efforts of the late Vaez Tabasi, who used to encourage Hashemi to participate in the elections in frequent meetings, this time he also met with Hashemi.Akbar Hashemi's memories - 1999 September 9 - Continued visits to the belongings, buildings and works of Astan Quds