Several friends and colleagues criticized my legal note on the leader of the Islamic Republic’s authority to legislate under Article 58 of the Constitution

I thank every one of them, even other friends who made a bad impression with great prejudice and accused me.

But friends, the issue is completely clear.

Article 110 of the Constitution and the 11 clauses cited by the Deputy Speaker of the Revolutionary Parliament that I published.

Now take a look at Article 5, which clearly and explicitly mentions that "Walayat Amr and Imamate of the Ummah" is included with those conditions. which has clearly considered these acts of power according to Article 107 and the last part of Article 107 of the Constitution also correctly and considers the leader as equal before the law with other members of the nation.

Now, where did this authority come from the Constitution, not even its spirit, not half of its principles, even Article 57 of the amendment to stop the implementation of all laws and give absolute judicial immunity to all its agents and enforcers?

From my point of view, the rights of the simple reader, even if this action and heresy was officially approved by the Supreme National Security Council and was implemented with the signature of the leader of the Islamic Republic according to Article 176, still had some legal justification; But never in this way.

I repeat I am an independent journalist and not a political activist; I hope a lawyer, especially the elders of constitutional rights, will address this issue and pay attention to the consequences of this action.