Abdi Media has received messages from respected lawyers who considered Article 167 of the Constitution exclusive to legal matters and related lawsuits, and based on Article 2 of the Islamic Penal Code, considered only the text of the law as the criterion

Read
1 minute
-Thursday 2024/09/19 - 11:28
News Code:1633
سخنگوی قوه قضاییه: درباره مجازات توهین به پرچم جمهوری اسلامی نص صریحی در قوانین نداریم

Abdi Media
While thanking the attention of the respected legal experts and the news of the legal discussions in this connection in the relevant groups and sent to me, I would like to mention that:
First, I am not a lawyer, and secondly, from the clarity of Article 167, I do not see a difference between legal and criminal matters.

How is it possible that the respected elders remove the rights of such separation from Article 167 of the Constitution?

In addition, although Article 220 of the new Islamic Penal Code is about limits and retribution, it is explicitly mentioned and referred to Article 167 of the Constitution, which is a sign that the law does not distinguish between criminal and legal matters.

It should be noted that I had emphasized after referring the case to the judge.

After all this, my main objection to the words of the spokesperson of the judiciary is that what is the need for the speaker to speak such a legal vacuum in the current inflamed atmosphere of the country?

The legal spokesperson of the Judiciary should definitely be careful with his public statements, especially in the current inflamed society.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up