Mustafa Tajzadeh's written message at the conference to save Iran

In his Nowruz speech in Mashhad, Ayatollah Khamenei made some points, among which I felt it necessary to respond to that part, which he unabashedly gave unfair comparisons to his critics and the legal and political structure of the system and easily called them followers of the enemies of the country, anti-religion and anti-revolution. And he said: "Unfortunately, inside, some people follow them (enemies) or imitate them, and express the same word with other interpretations: for example, changing the constitution or changing the structure of the Islamic system; This is the same word of foreigners, the same word of enemies, but the internal element sometimes repeats that word out of neglect, indifference, sometimes with other motives.

Ignoring the multitude of honorable and caring Iranians inside and outside the country who are looking for structural reform and changing the constitution, he introduces arrogance and Zionism as the followers of this transformation and claimed: "Their goal is to remove everything that reminds people of revolution and reminds of Islam; pure Islam and revolutionary Islam." Unfortunately, what is translated explicitly is unquestioning obedience to them.

The leader also said about this imaginary enemy that "the enemy's goal is to turn Islamic democracy into an arbitrary government. In Iran, they are looking for a government that is arbitrary, or an individual government that an obedient individual Either they are at work, or a government that appears to be a Western democracy, which [in reality] is a false democracy."

Leader also in a big omission about the great women's movement; life; Azadi, who gave a new life to Iran and impressed the world, assumed himself and his supporters to be the majority and called the protesters "a very small percentage of the Iranian nation"; "Very very very very little".

I leave it to the nation to judge whether the leader is in the minority or in the majority. But I just ask why the authority that considers itself to be supported by the majority of the people is at war with free elections and referendums? Apart from that, in a democratic system and based on rational logic, doesn't every official who has more authority have more responsibility? Or is it not more responsive? And shouldn't it be more seriously criticized and monitored? What institution has Mr. Khamenei answered so far?

In my opinion, monitoring the performance of the leader and criticizing his behavior and speech, whose authority has become absolute and who interferes in affairs as much as possible - although he tries to hide his interventions from the eyes of public opinion - is one of the rights and even the duties of citizenship of all Iranians. Also, I believe that in the sensitive and changing conditions of the world, which is full of constructive opportunities and destructive threats, the fate of the country should not be left in the hands of one person who, with his mistakes, will burn the opportunities, add to the national dangers, and keep the hope of things in order in mind. And the pronoun Qataba of the nation of Allah.

But regarding the leader's recent accusations against his critics and the succession of foreign and anti-Islamic enemies and calling them a revolution, it is necessary not for them - as the leader knows his critics well, including the likes of Banda - but for those who may be affected by such words. To finish the argument once and for all so that they know who are the millions of Muslim Iranians who are in favor of changing the structure and constitution and what do they believe?

who are we?

We are not against Islam, but we proudly announce that as Muslim and freedom-loving Iranians, we are against tyranny in the name of Islam and we believe that Islam is stratified, reactionary and...
Sayyed Mostafa Tajzadeh