The writers of "Waja" and "Sas" statements wrote an ideological and political statement, not a security and informational one

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

I read the joint statement of the Ministry of Information and the IRGC Intelligence Organization in full.

Rather than being a reasoned and inviolable security and information report, it seems to be an ideological and political statement that I hope the judiciary will not take judicial action under the influence of this statement and its analysis and maintain its independence.

With the arguments in the statement, any Iranian person can make any accusation they want, and anyone critical is also considered an enemy.

Is it strange that there are about 30 pages of joint reports? in which the names of all the security organizations of the world are also mentioned.

What was written was the narrative of the events and not the security view, and above all, the view of intelligence elites is aimed at predicting, preventing, or discovering hidden information or deciphering open information.

Most of this statement was similar to Keyhan's editorials rather than a statement of two important security and intelligence authorities. It seems that the writing of this statement was outsourced.

Basically, I don't know why it was necessary to publish this statement in this way. and to what extent its publication will help to reduce the existing tension, but with this statement, the security authorities exposed themselves to public and media accusations.

In this statement, unfortunately, the role of the police error as the initiator of this terrible incident the lack of planning by the internal regulatory authorities, and the failure to announce the incident in time have been ignored, and the whole beginning of the story, according to them, was marked by an experienced journalist?!

History can be read from anywhere, and if we do not pay attention to the main premises, any interpretation of the event after the premises lacks documentary validity.

It is stated in the statement that these two reporters were being monitored, could they not have been invited or summoned? He warned them and if he felt a security risk from them, he took another action that did not reach this day?

You must also know that the statements in this statement about those two journalists are not realistic and convincing, and there is a serious question as to what the country's intelligence agencies did to prevent it?

Does it all have to be an afterthought?

What has the Judiciary and the Vice-Chancellor of Social Affairs and Crime Prevention done with all these facilities for crime prevention except statistical shows and media?

And shouldn't the country's intelligence agencies be asked what they did to prevent it, according to this joint statement full of claims?

With your arguments, you can introduce any journalist as an agent of the enemy and imprison or restrict them at any time with similar accusations. What method is this?

With this statement, not only authority and nobility are not visible, but it is just a long political writing that is full of ambiguity and national and international forms, which can be a place to refer to and cite actions that are contrary to customs and international laws.

I wish the new statement writers, Waja and Sass, write a little more realistically, and if all their information analyses are like this, it will be disastrous.

The officials, especially the judges of the prosecutor's office and the courts, who only want to make decisions based on these reports and limit themselves in such reports, will lose both the world and the future.