With the report of the secretary of the National Security Council, is it time for the IRGC and the army to enter under the national security measures?

Ali Shamkhani, the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, finally submitted a detailed report to the Expediency Council, which was sent directly to the leader of the Islamic Republic.

Of course, Shaam's performance during this period has many doubts and most of the country's security council was active under the chairmanship of Ahmed Vahidi and secretary of Amir Ahmadi. But Shamkhani's report seems to be a complete summary of all the events that happened in the past 40 days and even before that.

The contexts and plans that took place for these days according to Shaam's secretariat by foreign services are also ready in this report.

According to reports, the protests will not end soon and it seems that they will intensify or continue in other ways and formats.

Now the question is this.

With the intervention of the Secretariat of the Supreme National Security Council and the warnings of the Chief of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, and especially with the recent terrorist crime in the shrine of Ahmed bin Musa (Shah Chirag) in Shiraz, has the Islamic Republic changed its policy in dealing with protests from under the control of public security and Will Faraja's direct intervention fall under the national security measures and will it be time for tougher confrontations or the involvement of the IRGC and finally the army?

It should be seen what exactly is the reaction of the high and senior members of the Islamic Republic?

And from this point of view, the result of the demands and protests will reach the objective clear, and concrete final goal?

And do the pillars and pyramid of power basically have a building to listen to the voices and words of the protestors?

And questions that we will find the answer to only in the critical time ahead.

Abdollah Abdi