A New Example of Judicial Precedent Issued on the Basis of International Human Rights Standards

Image

Image

Judges in national courts or international judicial bodies usually use different legal sources in the process of expressing their arguments related to each judicial decision, and the more accurate and extensive their follow-up and investigation in this process, the more it is possible to present a stronger argument.
In this context, there are many judges in our country who, in addition to referring to the relevant regulations, also use international legal sources or jurisprudential and religious sources, the studies of prominent professors of law, and a variety of national or transnational judicial procedures in order to achieve a stronger argument in their judicial decision. Of course, after the issuance of a judicial decision, this attempt can be theoretically criticized by any expert, and from a practical point of view, if it can be challenged within the framework of the laws of the country, it may be approved or violated in the later legal stages.
The above judgment is an example of the judicial precedent issued by the Fifth Branch of Appeals of the Ilam Judiciary and in addition to citing domestic standards, international human rights sources have also been cited.