Confused talk about terror

Ahmed Zaidabadi

Hassan Rahimpour Azghadi has made confusing words about the assassination of officials and the media has also caught up with him.

Confused and inadequate speech is usually a sign of confusion and mental incoherence, and this feature is clearly evident from Mr. Azghadi's collection of speeches.
Now, why the officials of IRIB insist on broadcasting these speeches to the public on their networks, is probably not unrelated to their ignorance and incoherence of these issues.

Without referring to Mr. Azghadi, I must say that, unfortunately, the scope of various sciences and knowledge in the field of humanities in the present age tempts some people with unscientific motives to hastily touch each of them. without having the possibility to integrate and logically relate them to each other.

Therefore, their mind becomes like a warehouse of used car spare parts, the more their volume increases, they only occupy more space without finding the least efficiency.

But a great misfortune occurs when a part of society does not see such people as geniuses and great and rare thinkers see that God has given them a great favor and made them their contemporaries.

In any case, if Mr. Ozghadi's view of life and death is the same as stated in his speech, why doesn't he himself take the initiative to accept death instead of encouraging people's children to be ashamed of being alive?

He may say that because the mass of terror in the country has gathered, there is nothing he can do to welcome death.
But this is an excuse. If he goes to Lebanon today and shoots Israeli soldiers from the border line with a weapon in his hand, he will without a doubt face his desired death.

He might say, his meaning has been misunderstood. It is possible. But what correct conclusion can be drawn from that confusing statement?