What is the real story of the attack and assassination of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and why is this issue raised now?

Mohsen Hashemi Rafsanjani talked about the assassination of his father in an interview with Etemad Online, you can watch the video of the interview.

Regardless of Mohsen Hashemi's conservative words and possible goals in this interview, it only refers to some signs without any conclusion.

Also, we will have to wait for years until the publication of Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani's memoirs in 2015, as usual, assuming that he will not undergo self-censorship or other censorship.

I wish Judge Hossein Ali Amiri, the then Deputy Minister of the Interior for Legal Affairs and Majlis and the current head of the 42nd branch of the Supreme Court, who is mentioned in these narratives of Akbar Hashemi, would write his supplementary memoirs, at least in the part that is related to him or Sardar Gurjizadeh, the then commander. Protect and narrate.

But the main question is:

How can a person enter the office of the head of the Council of Expediency, which is located next to the office of the leader of the Islamic Republic, the president, and the head of the judiciary and the government, and start arson?

And according to the story of one of the secretaries, he was also wounded and according to Mohsen Hashemi, a clear film of him was also available.

After the discovery and arrest of this dangerous and extremely important security and protection loophole of protection centers, instead of the involvement and investigation of relevant security institutions, should it be assigned to the intelligence police of the police force of the time or the intelligence department of the Greater Tehran Police District?!!

They also have all the technical and identification tools at their disposal; They say that they still haven't managed to find him, and then, apparently, after being arrested, he was considered insane and made interesting claims!!?

And a more important question that was neglected by Mohsen Hashemi during the reading of Akbar Hashemi's diary, but is extremely important:

Can it be imagined that the commander in chief even verbally ordered that Akbar Hashemi's protection forces should not change, but the protection corps changed the protection of Akbar Hashemi by disobeying the order of the human forces and they were not held accountable?

What conclusion should be drawn from these words?

Abdollah Abdi