The strange summoning of Mahtab Nasirpour / Reality or...?

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

Regarding the summoning of Mrs. Mehtab Nasirpour to the Special Security Prosecutor's Office, an image of a summons issued by the investigator of Branch 3 of the Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office of Tehran's 33rd District has been published in cyberspace, which is a little questionable and suspicious.

First of all, why was it not sent as an electronic notification by the system? The format of notices and judicial summons is not like this.

Second, if we assume that Ms. Nasirpour does not have a user account in the Sana system, and the investigator determines that a physical notice should be issued and sent to her by the bailiffs as the accused, why is a number similar to the branch file included instead of the comprehensive number of the charge file?

Third, regardless of the fact that the imputed charge is not included, in the warning for the possibility of bringing a lawyer with him, why should the relevant legal article be cited and also the lawyer from the lawyers of Article 48 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or not? Not mentioned?

Fourth, it is more interesting that it is mentioned that "in addition, you can refer to the office of this investigation to find out the reason for the summons."

That is, in order for Ms. Nasirpour to know what her charges are, she should personally go to the investigation office of Branch 3 of the Special Security Prosecutor's Office ask questions, and then leave the prosecutor's office.

This is contradictory to the nature of the summons, didn't the investigator summon to explain the charges?
Doesn't Mr. Inspector tell them there?

Adventures like what happened to Professor Farhoud bring to mind the question of whether this letter published in cyberspace is really true?