Home/Special noteSpokesperson of the Judiciary: We do not have an explicit text in the laws regarding the punishment for insulting the flag of the Islamic RepublicRead1 minute -Thursday 2024/09/19 - 11:13News Code:1631Share In 2017, it was suggested that 6 months to 2 years of imprisonment be considered for insulting the flag.Abdollah Abdi - Abdi MediaWhen the spokesperson of the judiciary mediates the gap in the law; As a judge and jurist, isn't he aware that according to Article 167 of the Constitution, if the case is referred to them, the judges are obliged to issue a verdict based on valid Islamic sources or valid fatwas, if they are not involved in a lawsuit in the codified laws?Isn't this kind of crime against the flag, which is a symbol of national unity, generally criminalized in existing normal laws?Of course, my intention is not to criminalize this act or not to criminalize it.I want to say, Mr. Speaker of the Judiciary, what signal does he give to the inflamed society?Doesn't Mr. Director General of the Secretariat and Spokesman of the Judiciary know that his words and in fact, his signal causes more inflammation and anger and attacks on the flag, without fear of punishment?What is really going on in the judiciary of the Islamic Republic? Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.Sign UpComming Up Next Please send verified and hopeful news with the utmost accuracy, as I will share them for the awareness of our esteemed compatriots. Or, substantiate the rejection of the alleged distortions with evidence. Is that too difficult?خواندن 1 minute I think everyone got what they wanted. They took their celebrations and the story, as I wrote before, will not go beyond these conditions.خواندن 1 minute A Question for the Deputy Chief of the President's Office and Head of the Government's Information Councilخواندن 1 minute Another Example of Legislative Writing and Its Approval in the Revolutionary Parliament, Particularly Regarding the Important Law of the Central Bankخواندن 2 minutes Very dangerous behavior of military and police forcesخواندن 1 minuteMost ReadMemories of Akbar Hashemi - February 20, 2000 - Meeting with Abdullah Jasbi and Concerns About Election ResultsMovie / Where is Commander Morteza Talaie?Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 10 - The two-person political negotiations with Vaez Tabasi continued until he was escorted to Tehran, where Hashemi apparently decided to seriously participate in the sixth parliamentary elections.The records of the recent periods of the Islamic Council showed that the parliament is not in charge of affairs and cannot interfere or pass resolutions on the authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces at any level, let alone supervise.What will be the future of Iran with the announced candidates for the presidential election? / Conversation with Dr. Taghi Azad AramakiCan I feel tired with you?A Basiji veterinarian was appointed head of the health network instead of an otolaryngologist.Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 5 - The meeting of the senior managers of the judiciary with Hashemi Rafsanjani and their complaint about the neglect of Hashemi Shahroudi, the new head of the judiciary, continues.Memories of Akbar Hashemi - 1999 September 7 - In continuation of the efforts of the late Vaez Tabasi, who used to encourage Hashemi to participate in the elections in frequent meetings, this time he also met with Hashemi.Akbar Hashemi's memories - 1999 September 9 - Continued visits to the belongings, buildings and works of Astan Quds