Publish a valid and important document or publish a worthless letter?

Just to inform you about the process of administrative correspondence, I would like to request that Abdul Maliki, as an adviser to the president, wrote to a tourist and "suggest" that such and such amount for such and such work should be paid to the "Ministry of Cooperation, Labor and Social Welfare" and not to "The text of the proposal is telling"

The head of the president's office also sent it to the program and budget organization "without the head of government's note" to "review and announce the result".

So far, because the advisor of the president has simply given a proposal to the head of government "regardless of the content" and the head of the president's office has referred it to the program organization for review "without the president's note of approval or disapproval", this is the usual procedure and cannot be done. He took issue with it.

However, if this process and the possible allocation of the budget with the orders and examination of the subsequent correspondence, including the response of the then head of the program and budget organization, involves violations of the rules and regulations, those documents must be published in the media for the consideration of the regulatory bodies and public information, and otherwise, the published information is only attractive for likes. .

I receive dozens of such letters every week with a confidential seal and above, which, like this letter, have a hidden layer for the public and are not just for the purpose of telling the truth, but they seek other desires, such as party goals or settling personal accounts. that the mission of the reporter is to distinguish the truth from the truth and also to tell the audience all the truth and the correct process of an article or process.

Abdollah Abdi