Mohammad Hossein Aghasi, the spokesperson of the legal celebrity, the lawyer of the accused or the partner in the trial of the officers?

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

Mohammad Hossein Aghasi, a famous lawyer living in Iran, who represents your presence?

Today, in an interview with BBC Farsi, he called the tragedy and crime committed against Mahsa Amini a murder.

Of course, as a lawyer, he is aware of the legal burden of his statement, and he will cooperate with the Human Rights Committee of the National Union of Iranian Lawyers (SKODA) to prove it so that the (murder) can be proven and the murderer identified.

But back to his interview; Agassi admits to a very important issue in another important case.

Mohammad Hossein Aghasi says frankly: In a very important case, he complained to the police of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the documents and cameras prove his claim that the police harassed his client.

But the Prosecutor's Office investigator, who does not give further explanation, has issued a restraining order due to the lack of sufficient reasons.

But what is the extremely important point of Aghasi's confession?

Even if there is a possibility of the approval of the prohibition order of the investigator by the competent court; As a lawyer, Agassi has no right to destroy the rights of his clients and is obliged to go through all possible legal avenues, which, of course, according to his explicit admission in this interview, he did not object to the investigator's restraining order; Did his clients tell him not to protest?

I don't want to accuse Mr. Agassi of colluding with the relevant protest organization system or a part of the judiciary for not protesting, but has this famous lawyer betrayed the trust of his clients or not?

Why didn't he object to this decision of the investigator despite the documents that he claims, and didn't he report the matter to the deputy of supervision and evaluation of the relevant justice judges or the disciplinary prosecutor of the judges to be recorded in the history?

Is it time to discuss how this celebrity lawyer defends and pursues cases in which the government was on one side, at least since 1994, and his political, security, and controversial clients from his South Iranshahr Street office until now? Or is it too early?

In the previous note, it was also asked that considering the internal ban on interviews with Persian-language television channels outside of Iran, how can only this lawyer have the possibility and permission to interview with any media without any reprimands or restrictions and by employing explicit and sometimes harsh literature?

Did the security-judicial system of the Islamic Republic seek to create the image of a celebrity lawyer to control the situation and its goals, and now with this celebrity, it presents the menus of the same security-judicial system to the audience with a well-groomed appearance, ties, and stylish literature?

Abdi Media does not allow facts to be hidden behind literature and stylish appearance.