Once again, a dyed chick was passed off as a canary to the people?

I’ll say it again: my understanding is that these documents were deliberately released, and in an utterly foolish and laughable manner, they have been heavily forged. The rest were uploaded to gather information and monitor new searches by interested parties. Essentially, a few burned-out cases were uploaded for people to search at specific intervals so that their information, search volume, IP addresses, and potential targets could be tracked.

The forgers (assuming, for argument's sake, that they didn’t deliberately release the documents for other, higher goals) don’t even know the basic principles of legal correspondences, the writing styles of judicial and law enforcement authorities, legal and security writing conventions, hierarchical protocols, or even similar fonts.

Woe to the political and media activists, and civil society actors, who fall into the trap of these documents. Later, when they realize—albeit with a slight delay—that these documents are forged, by comparing them with details from other documents, they’ll be left with a damaged reputation and serve as a laughingstock for the original designers and cyber-executors.

I’m just saying this, and let it be a memento in this world of trickery."