The decision of the first branch of the Tehran Islamic Revolution Court for Economic Affairs, headed by Mohammad Reza Sahibi Pasandideh, was issued and communicated in the case of Valiullah Saif, Seyyed Ahmad Araghchi and others

This decision is final according to Ayatollah Khamenei, the head of the Judiciary at the time, and cannot be appealed like other judicial decisions.

Of course, it remains to be seen whether the convicts of this case will request a retrial by the Supreme Court according to Article 474 of the Criminal Procedure Law.

Without judging the details and citations of this issued document, Abdi Media shares it by mentioning two very important and profound things to remind his companions:

First, that:
Rumors tell of the involvement of Ayatollah Khamenei in the case of the accused, then the first branch of the Supreme Court, whose head is the Supreme Court President. Based on paragraph C of Article 474 of the Criminal Procedure Law, "the act committed is not a crime or the punishment imposed is more than the legally prescribed punishment", the decision of the second branch of the Islamic Revolution Court for Economic Affairs was violated and referred to another branch (the current court of the first branch) data; While the current court has acquitted some cases and condemned some cases with its legal authority.

Second and more importantly:
In the complex structure of the power pyramid in the Islamic Republic of Iran, of which a few examples have been found in the circulation of this document, it is quite clear how difficult it is to manage the structure of this country. Strange though.

The way of referencing a correspondence or the type of writing a simple footnote may lead to different, sometimes contradictory, perceptions. that the type of reference of Hasan Rouhani and the correspondence of Ali Shamkhani, despite the explicit confirmations of the intelligence agencies, has caused other impressions for the judges of the previous court and this court branch.

And finally a question:

Like what happened in the Gholamhossein Karbaschi trial, the country's officials, including the former interior minister, signed their orders and authorizations "in writing", this time Hasan Rouhani and Ali Shamkhani explicitly and of course in a written voice supported the Central Bank officials for their measures, and Will they accept responsibility?

And in case of a written acceptance of responsibility, will it be a reason for a re-trial from the Supreme Court?

Also, in parallel with this action, will the head of the judiciary, with his extraordinary powers under Article 477 of the Criminal Procedure Law, or the Attorney General of the country with the powers under Article 290 of the Criminal Procedure Law, examine all aspects of the case and take appropriate legal action?

One should be a little patient and wait for the final result of these convictions and their implementation.

Abdollah Abdi