Dear Dr. Davari, greetings.

Read
5 minutes
-Wednesday 2024/10/16 - 16:31
News Code:4898
 جناب دکتر داوری درود

 

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media  

Even if Sheikh Kazem Sadeqi does not lead the Friday prayer in Tehran today for any reason, as I have precisely mentioned in my notes, a very successful targeted information management has surfed on the wave of the scandalous news about him and is currently managing it, with plans for two higher objectives that will soon be revealed.  

In reference to my previous notes in Abdi Media and the current result that you observe, I emphasize:  

1. No legal case has been opened against Sheikh Kazem in the special prosecutor's office for the clergy in Tehran so far. In clearer terms, the occurrence of a crime by him has not been established for the regime, and therefore, he has not been deprived of justice. Thus, from the perspective of the Islamic Republic and using current laws, especially civil law, others must prove their claims against Sheikh Kazem, not the other way around.  

2. Ayatollah Khamenei has prevented any damage to his reputation before the authorities with specific gestures and has repeatedly honored him. Although many have turned a blind eye to these actions that I have precisely pointed out and have attacked me, it has become clear what I said.  

3. I am aware that an accurate program about the observance of Laylat al-Qadr by Sheikh Kazem was published at Imam Sadiq University, and after the media atmosphere, this program was canceled under a higher program, but many fell into an informational trap and thought Sheikh’s career was over and that they had succeeded, as they wrote, in the manner that you know.  

4. In the meeting of the system officials, Sheikh was invited and once again honored, but again, no attention was paid to the message of that event. Of course, a few individuals understood the message but did not pursue it further.  

5. The former spokesperson for the judiciary merely referred to the cancellation of a transaction without mentioning Sheikh Kazem, and it is obvious that the cancellation of the mentioned property, according to the laws and regulations of the Islamic Republic, is not a proof of crime in the special clergy court and does not result in a definitive ruling against Sheikh Kazem; rather, it may serve as an indication for others.  

Unfortunately, media representatives did not pay attention to how the spokesperson would say that for similar questions regarding clerics, especially concerning the case of Sheikh Hassan Rouhani, one should ask the special prosecutor for the clergy and refer to that authority, not the judiciary. Yet now, after references to the cancellation and even with details from the notary, he emphasizes this?  

- Now, with the gestures and direct permission of the permanent Friday prayer leader of Tehran, he leads the Friday prayer.  

A "small" part of this action is:  

If there is an insult to the Friday prayer, which is a red line for the Islamic Republic, and its just Friday prayer leader (which you will see tomorrow whether the present national, military, and judicial officials pray behind the just Friday prayer leader in the front rows or not), from the perspective of the Islamic Republic, it is considered a confrontation with the leader of the Islamic Republic and the sanctity of the prayer and its appointed Friday prayer leader.  

This is in accordance with the clear belief of the Islamic Republic that Sheikh Kazem Sadeqi has committed no crime.  

Now, the interesting layer of this puzzle is that, from the perspective of the intelligence and judicial agencies, those who claim that the Friday prayer leader is unjust and even criminal—especially journalists and activists inside the country—are responsible, and according to current law, they must prove their claims.  

They clearly want to say that news was published in cyberspace with documents, and without any accusation against this person, you crafted and fueled it, and then disrupted the atmosphere, resulting in such an outcome. You did not trust the judicial organization of the country that had the inherent competence to address this matter, and you did not heed the messages, so you are responsible for the possible outcome.  

In your view, while you are looking to discover the infiltration line behind his leading of the Friday prayer and seeking clues, and you publicly label the Sheikh as a liar, while another calls him corrupt, and you conduct polls regarding participation or non-participation in the Friday prayer, what is your opinion about the complex use and management designed by intelligence agencies in this regard, especially from “a corruption and exposure by my esteemed colleague Mr. Yashar Soltani,” which has become the best tool to confront activists in cyberspace and media with the bright red lines of the Islamic Republic?  

Which of the respected colleagues or yourself or the esteemed lawyers of the judiciary are aware of this complex intelligence management and extensive net, if they are questioned or held accountable, about the real behind-the-scenes situation and the very specific documents and permits of Sheikh Kazem, of which I only passed over briefly? Can they prove the crime as it is?  

Do you think they will overlook it just because it has been stated in cyberspace?  

Just like Ahmad Vahidi's actions regarding hijab and chastity, which, despite all the media uproar and claims of legal grievances against him (which I referred to in another note titled “The Hard Path of Summoning Vahidi”), I wrote that he is supported by much higher authorities, and you can see the results of those notes today.  

Please pay attention; you and your other esteemed companions, or the ready cyber army, and a few individuals tasked with amplifying this informational trap, that this note is in no way a support for Sheikh Kazem but rather a demonstration of the dimensions of the complex informational and security design aimed at achieving a higher goal by utilizing every crisis that arises. If the honorable activists in media and cyberspace fall into this trap, this flow of information from within to cyberspace and precise reporting will be cut off.  

Do they want anything other than this pure cleansing set?  

May this bitter writing of mine and the unwritten lines remain as a reminder.  

Wishing you success.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up