The case of Dr. Mohsen Burhani, like a diamond, is becoming clear

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

It is worth noting, dear friends and companions, that I often use the phrase and the full title "Hujjat al-Islam wal-Muslimeen Doctor" in addressing professor Dr. Mohsen Burhani.

Irrespective of the professor's twitter ID card, which clearly states that he is a "student of the seminary"; I will not deal with other matters related to him, the seminaries and seminaries; Please read paragraph 3 of Mr. Burhani's tweet.

Regardless of the fact that this charge is considered a crime only for "clergymen" according to paragraph b of article 13 and the note under article 18 of the regulations of special courts and clergy courts approved by Ayatollah Khamenei; It has a very subtle point, and if the professor has written a precise proof, committing acts against them is "spirituality" and not "lawyering"!!!

In clearer words; Calling judges to debate and other challenges in the position of "lawyer" has not been accused and described as criminal.

Now, the non-mention of such information and charges by the special prosecutor for the clergy of the relevant jurisdiction can definitely not be without coordination with Mohseni Ajieh, the appointed special prosecutor for the clergy, or Sheikh Mohammad Mosaddeq, his judicial deputy, who is also the head and first deputy of the judiciary.

In the previous tweet, the teacher clearly claimed that the IRGC Intelligence Organization's report was not approved by the special prosecutor, and according to the more accurate account of the teacher, "their bullet was crushed"! It means that no conviction has been issued by the assistant prosecutor and special prosecutor in relation to that report.

Ignoring that if such a thing were real, the legal deputy or the head of the IRGC Intelligence Organization, with all that influence in the eyes of the head and first deputy of the judiciary, who are also the prosecutor and the deputy of the special prosecutor's office, would not be able to enter the system with just a phone call and finally a face-to-face meeting. A judicial package that revolves around the basis and centrality of the appointed prosecutor, should they defend themselves from the report and return the opinion of the relevant prosecutor and assistant prosecutor?

Of course, it is clear that it is part of a larger political, informational and quasi-judicial game, which is not possible to maneuver in this way and nakedly in the atmosphere of the prosecutor's office and public courts and the revolution with more observation.

Did you notice a small part of the main reason for filing the case and not allowing other authorities and judicial authorities to deal with their charges?

Also, "suspension" and not "expulsion" from the University of Tehran after all the claims and media space and fortunately no concrete restrictions in the current process of his legal representation in the legal department and affairs of the judiciary despite the supervision and management of Mr. Poursaid in this position and the prosecutor's office Law enforcement of the center's lawyers' association; It alone made some of my previous notes clearer.

In the same period, the number of attorneys and current and closed cases of the professor can be easily monitored in the judiciary system; Which is self-explanatory.

📌 Wait a little, the matter will be clearer than diamonds; Even if the teacher is convicted in the first court and then on appeal.