Again forgery and again fake letter from a very suspicious group

I don't know what to say to these fake documents that I don't know or understand the real purpose of.

Is this Adalat Ali group also a part of the psychological warfare puzzle of the Islamic Republic? Or were they played by another group?

From the beginning, when the movies of Evin detention center were aired, it was always a question mark for me. Or except for the central camera room of this detention center, which has the elites of the non-security cells and its external areas and the officials of those centers, the videos of other centers are not published, even its administration? Were they not important?

Regardless of that, why and for what purpose does this group publish fake documents in its Telegram channel in this very simple way?

And my other questions in the recently published fake sample:

Indeed, the forgers of these letters, like other forgeries, do not know the difference between the letterhead of the Public Prosecutor's Office and the Revolution and Tehran and the Justice of the whole Tehran Province.

Doesn't forgery know how to send and report the deputy prosecutor and the head of a judicial district to the prosecutor and the difference between the letterhead of the prosecutor's office and the printout of automated sending with a physical letter?

Are the fonts of published documents all the same? Which font of each of the prosecutor's offices and Shahriari's correspondence of the deputy prosecutor of Tehran and the head of the criminal prosecutor's office with any authority, both judicial and administrative, is this type?

In the previously published forgery, the addressee was the Director General of Justice of Tehran province, but after I mentioned in my previous note that the Deputy Prosecutor's letter cannot and is not customary to address directly to the Director General of Justice of the province, this time it was faked to address the addressee. They gave the prosecutor of Tehran.

But again, regardless of the confusion of the composition of the text and references to non-judicial cases and anecdotes, none of the judicial officials, let alone the deputy prosecutor, use these expressions in the judicial report; It is interesting to know:

The number of this letter does not start with any of the correspondence classification codes of the Tehran Public Prosecutor's Office and General Justice of Tehran Province, which starts with 9001.

The class number of the alleged case is not included in this report and the investigation authority of that investigation or prosecution, and even the filing number of that branch and the system class number are not included, and the deputy prosecutor must have forgotten to write it down and assumed that the prosecutor also has a sixth sense to give an order on the records of the case that is class Is it not clear?

Which deputy prosecutor is a regular force and not a judicial staff, even despite the issuance of an order by the head of the judiciary, which usually addresses the deputy or the attorney general of the country, or in special cases in the provinces, the chief justice of the province, and in Tehran, the prosecutor is an exception. General and Revolution of Tehran, which is equivalent to the Chief Justice of Tehran Province.

Which middle official who deals with the order of the head of the department refers directly to himself? Ja'alin, at least learn the judicial administrative hierarchy.

The jurisdiction of the 27th District Prosecutor's Office of Tehran (Criminal Affairs) is the city of Tehran and not the province of Tehran, let alone generalizing it to the whole country.

There are several other technical problems with this forgery, which we will not discuss to prevent counterfeiters from confusing people by learning them and correcting such forgeries.

I would like to point out that the publication of false information, which can be verified by various methods and easily, especially in government documents, is completely in the direction of the deniers' wishes.

Abdollah Abdi