The real powers of the National Security Council and the provincial and county security councils, and the continuation of the targeted security game with public opinion

For the information of those who claim that the resolutions of the National Security Council and the provincial and county security councils are "consultative" and not binding, and who are unaware of the existing realities and the powers and composition granted to the National Security Council in various periods according to the last part of Article 176 of the Constitution, which I have referred to multiple times in Abdul Media, as well as those who make targeted recommendations sometimes guided by specific leaders to the public opinion:

Please pay attention to the text and implication of Article 39 of the Penal Code for Military Crimes:

"Any military or police commanders or officials who, as applicable, fail to implement the resolutions of the National Security Council (National Security Council of the country, provincial or county security council) in cases where they are legally obliged to do so shall be sentenced to imprisonment for six months to two years unless they are subject to harsher punishments under other laws or are not subject to the punishment of mohareb."

Does this legal provision imply that the resolutions of the National Security Council and the provincial and county security councils are considered "consultative"?

I wish it were possible to publish the classified resolutions from various periods of the National Security Council regarding the structure, organization, and authority of these councils, which are sanctioned by Ayatollah Khamenei in accordance with the last part of Article 176 of the Constitution.

I will address the "Hijab and Chastity Headquarters" and its extensive powers led by Ahmad Vahidi later.

However, the Islamic Republic, especially the secretariat of the National Security Council, the secretariat of the provincial security councils, and especially the office of the deputy commander of the armed forces in the police (FARAJA), also intentionally and systematically have no desire to clarify public opinion and the media, even in a general sense, for larger objectives known to Abdul Media. They prefer to maintain the current false media environment and incomplete comments stemming from inaccurate information.

I reiterate:
Do not engage and deceive the people purposefully; present the essence of the matter. Do you have the capacity, or is it allowed to manage public opinion only within the framework of a security puzzle?