Useful or boring repetition?

 In his speech on Thursday at the one-day conference of the National Accord, Mr. Pezeshkian discarded the text that had been prepared for his speech, saying: "The texts prepared by the dear ones are very valuable and influential, but what I believe is more important is the expression of what comes from the heart and is not found in the pre-prepared texts. The texts that were prepared earlier reflected the frameworks that I believe in. What I believe, and I emphasized earlier during the elections, are principles that are formed around truth and justice."

Today's people's expectations of Mr. President are different from the election period. Today, rather than being thirsty to hear what is said that is very good and comes out of the heart, they are waiting to hear content that is the product of the collective wisdom and expertise of the government, and that is spoken by the president, and more importantly, that it observes the actions and executive policies.

No matter how eloquent politicians are, their words quickly become repetitive and boring or boring. In the same speech, Mr. President, which focuses on justice and truth, he made some very valuable points.

 What distinguishes individuals, especially rulers, from each other is the difference in their perceptions of the examples of justice and the implementation of this slogan. A clear example of the incident occurred on Thursday, and Mr. Pezeshkian did not provide any explanation for it. This example refers to his very important slogan, namely "concord".  This is a slogan that we also believe that without it, no knot will be untied from the broken work of this country, and announcing this slogan and trying to realize it is definitely the pride of the doctors.

But what does it mean on Earth? How can we move towards it? In what case will we say whether this slogan has reached the desired conclusion or not? What role does your opponent and his behavior play in his defeat and victory? The people and we, as the people who observe and address your words, do not understand your clear and concrete understanding of this slogan. In fact, we do not know where its boundaries are.

For example, at the inauguration of the hospital, where most of the political figures were invited, why should Mr. Khatami be prevented from attending? From which law, Sharia, and ethics does this prohibition originate? What is your position as president on this issue?