The strange justification and emotional denial of the Public Relations Manager of the Social Security Organization, while bulk text messages were sent to the insured

Public Relations of the Social Security Organization said:

Around noon on Thursday, February 2, a text message was sent to several mobile phone numbers, in which it was claimed that this organization plans to reduce subsidies from the beginning of next year by misusing the name of the Social Security Organization. He informs that this text message has nothing to do with the organization and the matter is based on fake and lies.

Mr. Chief Security Officer of the Social Security Organization

Instead of this kind of emotional denial, check why your organization's notification messages are sent to the insured from the Raitel number?

And now that a person or persons sent their protest with the same number and en masse to the insured and citizens, does it have anything to do with your organization? How is the number and information provided to the senders?

Instead of following up on the cause and explaining the information leak, what is the justification that your public relations publishes? Public Relations of the Social Security Organization said:

Around noon on Thursday, February 2, a text message was sent to several mobile phone numbers, in which it was claimed that this organization plans to reduce subsidies from the beginning of next year by misusing the name of the Social Security Organization. He informs that this text message has nothing to do with the organization and the matter is based on fake lies.

Mr. Chief Security Officer of the Social Security Organization

Instead of this kind of emotional denial, check why your organization's notification messages are sent to the insured from the Raitel number?

And now that a person or persons sent their protest with the same number and en masse to the insured and citizens, does it have anything to do with your organization? How is the number and information provided to the senders?

Instead of following up on the cause and explaining the information leak, what is the justification that your public relations publishes?