This is not the case at all, the professor had publicly said that he would go to the investigator to give explanations, and since he himself said such a thing publicly, my question is what was the result of that summons and appearance before the investiga

Read
1 minute
-Thursday 2025/04/17 - 13:03
News Code:16454
اصلا اینگونه نیست استاد علنی فرموده بودند برای ادای توضیحات نزد بازپرس میروند و چون علنی خودشان چنین مطلبی را فرمودند سوالم این است نتیجه آن احضار و حضور نزد بازپرس چه بود و آیا میشود گزارش یا شکایت وارده را در کلیات شرح دهند چیست؟

 If they have a legal excuse or have been advised not to say what happened, they should point it out.

 If they have a legal excuse or have been advised not to say what happened, they should point it out.

As for this story, which I have commented on, the security forces do not have the authority to impose these restrictions independently, and if an arrest is issued to anyone, no one can stop the arrest, except the person who issued it.

Therefore, such a narrative that is carried out in this way is not correct

good luck

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up