The story of uranium enrichment in the eventful statement of the Reform Front / Arab-Sorkhi: The statement refers to a “temporary suspension,” not a “halt of enrichment”!
The content of the Reform Front’s statement is completely acceptable. It’s possible that in the statement a single word appeared differently.
Feyzollah Arab-Sorkhi, political activist:
The content of the Reform Front’s statement is entirely acceptable. There may be a single word in the statement that I do not like, but the overall statement and its proposed solutions are perfectly fine. Many of these points have been raised repeatedly in the past.
The strongest proposal is the issue of a “temporary suspension of enrichment” in exchange for the complete lifting of sanctions.
This proposal does not mean stopping enrichment; rather, it refers to a temporary suspension. Previously, in the Saadabad Agreement, we accepted a suspension for a certain period, which the other parties effectively violated; Iran had no intention of violating it.
Therefore, I do not believe this proposal is extreme. If we assume it is, the Islamic Republic has already implemented it.
