Abdi Madia's important explanations about the "false statements of Mustafa Mirslim" regarding the conviction of his prisoner Aghazadeh

Dear Mr. Engineer Mustafa Mirsalim.

First of all: I am glad that you did not deny me to publish other documents.
Second, your explanation had nothing to do with covering all aspects of what I published.

After the news of the imprisonment of Mustafa Mirslim's son was published in the silence of news and information, once again due to the suffocation of information and the media as an important pillar of the republic and democracy, Mirslim gave an interview to the Tasnim security agency and presented false statements.

My question was about the publication of the article by the judiciary, but now that they want to hide the truth, I have to inform them about other dimensions.

First of all, the judiciary should explain when you say that you had no involvement in the process of his investigation and trial, how and why were the judiciary and its special officers lenient towards a security prisoner?
Sir, we are sending
Class case: 9709980277900295 was established in 2017 in the Tehran General and Revolution Prosecutor's Office, Special Security, and you know that a judicial case is established when the initial report of the officer is sent to the prosecutor's office and then referred to the investigator, and the initial information measures end and the judicial measures begin, and your honorable sir only after Since his arrest, he has been in police custody for 9 days, which means that all the investigation and investigation of the dimensions of this case took 9 days.

With all the security, administrative, political, and party records since the beginning of your revolution, do you know of a suspect with security charges, especially community, and collusion, who was interrogated 9 days after his arrest, and a final report was prepared and released by the investigator on bail?

Girim - Assuming that your claims are impossible - during the investigation and interrogation, the bailiff and the investigator realized that your son, who was born abroad in 1974, was not an important element and subject, and according to your interpretation, he had no effect and was released on bail.

It is natural that in this case, the Revolutionary Court and then the Court of Appeals and even the Supreme Court of the country should give him a light sentence in the review of the retrial, while they should give him a stricter legal sentence, and that is not an action against national security according to your interpretation, but "community and collusion". It has been condemned against the security of the country.

Why don't you tell me exactly with whom and what group and what specific goals he had "association and participation" that even being your son and Aghazadeh did not make him reach the minimum or average amount of legal punishment and he was sentenced to the most severe legal punishment?

We accept your efforts (or with hypothetical trust in your word), and your lack of involvement, but the involvement of your fans and friends inside and outside the judiciary in the appeals court did not reduce or change this punishment.

Dear Mr. Mirslim

You, who claim that you had no involvement in his trial process, as a member of the Islamic Council a member of the law, and a monitoring activist, who are fighting corruption and are committed to fighting corruption, shouldn't you first monitor your family and ask why your prisoner Aghazadeh more than 200 days from Evin prison after being sentenced and sent to prison, he is on the run, or as a law-abiding person, would you have handed him over to the prison or the prosecutor, and why did you keep silent about his absence? And special authorities and prosecutors and prisons were so busy that they forgot such a prisoner?

Basically, why did the judiciary or your sympathizing supporters (without your intervention) suddenly get angry and while a prisoner was absent from leave, they raised his case in the pardon commission of the judiciary, and then with the signature and suggestion of Mohseni Ajei, the current head of the judiciary Did Khamenei pardon half of the 5-year sentence?

It is good to be careful, who first announced that you had no involvement in the case and did not know that the honorable Aghazadeh had been absent from leave for more than 200 days, now suddenly your sense of fatherhood blossomed and you complained to the head of the judiciary that his co-prisoners They harass and extort, as they say, and...

Sir, we are sending

These words are really funny and it is not your dignity and political personality. You could have simply investigated and raised a complaint about the treatment of a prisoner with the head of the prison or the managers of Tehran prisons or the head of the prison organization, but your Excellency made this a hypothetical excuse and based on your claim. You dragged the head of the judiciary to the person!

You probably know that while other members of the parliament follow the affairs and pursuits of their constituencies through the parliamentary deputy of the Ministry of Justice or the legal deputy and affairs of the parliament of the judiciary and rarely (except in special cases) inform the head of the judiciary, you have such power. It has been and is that the head of the Judiciary stepped in and took action.

And, interestingly, the answer and output of your letter and complaint is the forgiveness of half of the imprisonment and probably the release of the respected Aghazadeh soon.

A more important question is raised, if your claim that other prisoners were harassing him is true, Evin prison has several prisons and different halls, why did they harass the honorable Aghazadeh, who was the easiest way to move him to another hall or ward, or even transfer the supposed prisoners. They didn't transfer the donor to another place and he is still in the 8th ward?

Do you understand the consequences of your words?

In addition, regarding the claim of your child's illnesses, why did he or his family not use the possibility of Article 502 of the Criminal Procedure Law, and in this way, by introducing the assistant prosecutor for the execution of the prosecutor's orders, it could easily be referred to the Forensic Medicine Commission, and the severity of the illness was checked, but you did not go? why Because in this case, if Aghazadeh's illnesses were confirmed, the execution of the sentence would be temporarily stopped, but you are not looking for the case to be open and the execution to be stopped, but you were looking to close the conviction case, and you are in silence, and the best way is for you after the failure of other efforts. Pardon and then reduction of the punishment and finally use the possibility of conditional release.

Do other prisoners, especially political and according to your friends, security have similar facilities?

If this prisoner was the brother or son of one of the other officials in the opposite faction, what kind of cries would have been expressed by the media and numerous spokespersons?
engineer
You have such influence that even after the detailed and documented disclosure of #Abdi_Media inside the country, no media dared to address this news and even verify and deny it, and now Tasnim security news agency has also interviewed you to prevent the publication of other materials, but Your explanations had nothing but regret for the state of the country's politics, with which you lie so easily, and they have just threatened me with the consequences of this disclosure.

I wish you wouldn't talk like wearing linen and then tweet justifying it as an old gift!

In your opinion, that linen with that new model was a very old gift? Or is that shoe model new?

Mr. We send! Tell your users and advisors or your grandchildren to teach you what the old and new models look like and what their differences are so that you don't make this mistake.

I emphasize again that the audience for my information and questions was and is the judiciary, and now that I have seen your words and your false justifications, I felt it necessary to give a brief answer that if you are going to explain, explain it correctly.

I hope I don't get forced to publish more details.