In fact, he has not rejected it. More precisely, the plaintiffs had sought the annulment of a directive, the outcome of which was a decision by the President.
The Administrative Court of Justice initially issued an order to suspend the conclusion of this letter.
In fact, he has not rejected it.
More precisely, the plaintiffs had sought the annulment of a directive, the outcome of which was a decision by the President.
The Administrative Court of Justice initially issued an order to suspend the conclusion of this letter.
Then, after consultations and with the approval of the third Leader, the President, through the Secretariat of the Supreme National Security Council, the Central Headquarters of Khatam al-Anbiya, and especially the commander of the Cyber Defense and Modern Threats Headquarters, proceeded to nominally reopen the internet through another channel and with the stipulated modifications, albeit under the guise of this steering headquarters.
Now, the Administrative Court of Justice has stated that the conclusion has effectively been reached and the court can do nothing about it, and it has issued an order — which is a natural and legal procedure.
«عیبِ مِی جمله چو گفتی، هنرش نیز بگو!»
دیوان عدالت اداری، شکایت ۴ «عنصر» دلسوز به فضای مجازی را از دولت به خاطر وصل اینترنت، رد کرد👇 pic.twitter.com/VWcqq0Hldf— Hadi Hadizadeh (@HadiHadizadeh) June 9, 2026
🔴 درود
در حقیقت رد نکرده است.
💢موضوع دقیق تر این است شکات خواستار ابطال یک دستورالعمل بوده اند که نتیجه اش تصمیم گیری رییس جمهور بوده
🔸 دیوان عدالت اداری ابتدا قرار توقف نتیجه گیری این نامه را صادر کرد.
🔸 سپس رییس جمهور با #رایزنی و پس از موافقت #رهبر_سوم، از طریق دبیرخانه…— AbdiMedia | عبدی مدیا (@AbdiMedia_net) June 10, 2026
