Home/legalTehran Judiciary Judicial Meeting on the Status of Property Repossession in the Event of the Defendant's DeathRead1 minute -Saturday 2025/10/11 - 13:25News Code:23024Share In the event of the death of the defendant before the verdict is final (at the appeal stage), issuing a stay of prosecution order for allImage Image Image In response to a question about the status of forfeiture in the event of the defendant’s death, the Tehran Provincial Judicial Council has given a majority opinion that if the defendant dies before the verdict is final, the entire criminal case, including forfeiture, is closed.Majority Opinion (Consensus):- If the defendant dies before the verdict is final (at the appeal stage), issuing a stay of prosecution order for all aspects of the case, including forfeiture, is mandatory. This order includes all criminal and financial effects such as penalties, forfeiture of property, and blood money.- If the defendant dies after the verdict is final, the verdict can be enforced from the deceased’s estate.Majority Key Arguments:1. The Criminal Procedure Code does not allow the separation of the public and private aspects of a crime in the event of the defendant’s death.2. The realization of criminal liability and its consequences is dependent on the defendant’s life until the end of the proceedings.3. The prevailing judicial practice and the decisions of the Supreme Court confirm this interpretation. Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.Sign UpComming Up Next Professor Dr. Burhani, greetings to you, as a professor of the field and university and a lawyer, you can express your opinion in any field you want and express your freedom of expression....خواندن 1 minute Do you recall my closed note addressed to the Head of the Judiciary after the missile attack on Evin detention center?خواندن 1 minute The Missions of the Bar Association in the National Program for Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorismخواندن 2 minutes Is this speaker aware of the broad powers granted to the Special Court for the Clergy to allow investigation and gathering of information from defendants, suspects, and connected individuals?خواندن 1 minute Mohseni Eje'i, Head of the Judiciary: We cannot publish every incorrect and inaccurate statement in the name of fighting corruption.خواندن 1 minuteMost ReadMemories of Akbar Hashemi - February 20, 2000 - Meeting with Abdullah Jasbi and Concerns About Election ResultsMovie / Where is Commander Morteza Talaie?Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 10 - The two-person political negotiations with Vaez Tabasi continued until he was escorted to Tehran, where Hashemi apparently decided to seriously participate in the sixth parliamentary elections.The records of the recent periods of the Islamic Council showed that the parliament is not in charge of affairs and cannot interfere or pass resolutions on the authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces at any level, let alone supervise.What will be the future of Iran with the announced candidates for the presidential election? / Conversation with Dr. Taghi Azad AramakiCan I feel tired with you?A Basiji veterinarian was appointed head of the health network instead of an otolaryngologist.Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 5 - The meeting of the senior managers of the judiciary with Hashemi Rafsanjani and their complaint about the neglect of Hashemi Shahroudi, the new head of the judiciary, continues.Memories of Akbar Hashemi - 1999 September 7 - In continuation of the efforts of the late Vaez Tabasi, who used to encourage Hashemi to participate in the elections in frequent meetings, this time he also met with Hashemi.Akbar Hashemi's memories - 1999 September 9 - Continued visits to the belongings, buildings and works of Astan Quds