Mohammad Hossein Saket said: "It is very good for the head of the judiciary to set an example for using the capacity of peace and reconciliation in security cases."
Mohammad Hossein Saket said: "It is very good for the head of the judiciary to set an example for using the capacity of peace and reconciliation in security cases."
Or at least they wanted the security authorities and raised this issue with them and reached an instruction. It means that their intention is good, but we have to go out of their way.
In my opinion, there is no meaning in "compromise" in the security issue. Compromise with whom? For example, I have filed a security complaint against you and we should make peace and compromise?! Do the security issues belong to you and me?! There is an assumption that, for example, you put a camera in my private life and jeopardized my apparent security.
In your opinion, as a journalist, who creates the security file? For example, let the police, intelligence, intelligence, or IRGC file a complaint against me and then go to the peace court together and solve it?! Can such a thing happen?! If he would set an example, it would be very good.
Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up