My behavior is based on completely correct and factual information.

Read
1 minute
-Tuesday 2024/10/15 - 17:52
News Code:4725
توییت عبدالله عبدی

In Iran's legal system, from the establishment of the judiciary until now, has there ever been a precedent for debates between lawyers and judges outside the context of the accusatory and trial process?

Of course, what’s wrong with it? It’s actually excellent. But suspending the matter is impossible.

 

The lawyer has formal and substantive objections according to the prescribed procedures in criminal and civil procedure, and he is pursuing it, which is not the subject of my discussion. 

The distortion of reality and the negligence of these two lawyers and their contradictions do not indicate the truthfulness and full disclosure of the opposite party, namely the judiciary.

I have not entered the details of the case, and it is not within my expertise.

My questions are completely clear. 

Both claiming lawyers did not provide timely and accurate information and are now making claims.

Now there are only two options:

1. Either they knew and neglected it, leaving it to God, and did not know how to pursue it correctly.

2. Or they did not know and are now resorting to a blind attack strategy to justify their negligence.

Now they want to expose the judiciary. What could be better than this? This is the ball, and this is the field."

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up