Amir Raisan, an attorney, announced the summoning of his colleague, Ms. Mahdokht Damghanpour, regarding the late Mohammad ghobadloo to the Public and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office of District 35 in Tehran

However, this esteemed and exceptionally brave lawyer was unable to respond to the simple questions from Abdi Media and may have deemed it unworthy of himself to answer, or perhaps he correctly anticipated that subsequent questions would raise further details.  

The same questions were repeated after the interview with Ms. Mahdokht Damghanpour, but the result of my inquiries was met with insults and very superficial criticisms, sometimes rooted in professional biases from some associates and legal practitioners, with no attention or legal response to the entirely clear questions.  

From the beginning, I criticized the statements of Mr. Raisan (strictly regarding the application of Article 477 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and solely concerning the process leading to the implementation of the death penalty, without any bias or endorsement of the actions and processes of the judiciary). Initially, I did not critique Ms. Damghanpour; however, it seems that she made a peculiar statement to Iran Watch, which clearly contradicted Mr. Amir Risan's previous claims, and now, with that interview, the esteemed lawyer has hidden behind Ms. Damghanpour's words.  

Here, I reiterate clearly: my criticisms of the defense process for the late ghobadloo are in no way a defense or endorsement of the actions of the judiciary.