Home/legalThe ruling issued by Branch 27 of the Administrative Justice Court regarding the annulment of the decision of the Administrative Offenses Board and the reduction of the penalty from four years of prohibition from appointment to sensitive and managerial poRead1 minute -Saturday 2025/06/07 - 11:46News Code:19259Share For the first time, the employee in question was sentenced to a five-year deprivation of appointment to sensitive and managerial positions.Image The employee in question was initially sentenced to a five-year prohibition from holding sensitive and managerial positions. In 2022, an appeal was made against that ruling.The first instance branch of the court issued a ruling to reject the complaint and uphold the verdict of the administrative violations board, but upon further appeal, the higher branch overturned the verdict based on the argument of disproportion between the violation and the punishment.The relevant administrative violations board then reduced the five-year prohibition from holding sensitive and managerial positions to only four years!An appeal was also made against the second ruling of the administrative violations board, and the 27th review branch of the court, under the provisions of Article 63 of the Administrative Justice Court, concluded the matter pursuant to the above judgment. Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.Sign UpComming Up Next Professor Dr. Burhani, greetings to you, as a professor of the field and university and a lawyer, you can express your opinion in any field you want and express your freedom of expression....خواندن 1 minute Do you recall my closed note addressed to the Head of the Judiciary after the missile attack on Evin detention center?خواندن 1 minute The Missions of the Bar Association in the National Program for Combating Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorismخواندن 2 minutes Is this speaker aware of the broad powers granted to the Special Court for the Clergy to allow investigation and gathering of information from defendants, suspects, and connected individuals?خواندن 1 minute Mohseni Eje'i, Head of the Judiciary: We cannot publish every incorrect and inaccurate statement in the name of fighting corruption.خواندن 1 minuteMost ReadMemories of Akbar Hashemi - February 20, 2000 - Meeting with Abdullah Jasbi and Concerns About Election ResultsMovie / Where is Commander Morteza Talaie?Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 10 - The two-person political negotiations with Vaez Tabasi continued until he was escorted to Tehran, where Hashemi apparently decided to seriously participate in the sixth parliamentary elections.The records of the recent periods of the Islamic Council showed that the parliament is not in charge of affairs and cannot interfere or pass resolutions on the authority of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces at any level, let alone supervise.What will be the future of Iran with the announced candidates for the presidential election? / Conversation with Dr. Taghi Azad AramakiCan I feel tired with you?A Basiji veterinarian was appointed head of the health network instead of an otolaryngologist.Akbar Hashemi's memoirs - 1999 September 5 - The meeting of the senior managers of the judiciary with Hashemi Rafsanjani and their complaint about the neglect of Hashemi Shahroudi, the new head of the judiciary, continues.Memories of Akbar Hashemi - 1999 September 7 - In continuation of the efforts of the late Vaez Tabasi, who used to encourage Hashemi to participate in the elections in frequent meetings, this time he also met with Hashemi.Akbar Hashemi's memories - 1999 September 9 - Continued visits to the belongings, buildings and works of Astan Quds