Mr. Zia Nabavi, The great problem and harm in the reports of intelligence agencies and special agents in general is that judges often consider those reports to be revelations, and even if they do not know, there is no means
Finally, the relevant judge sends the report to the protection body of that device and is demanding review.
Ultimately, the relevant judge sends the report to the security agency of that institution and requests a review.
But if the protection also approves or does not take appropriate action, there is practically nothing more the judicial authority can do.
Even if the beneficiary complains to the relevant intelligence authority on charges of false reporting, how and with what means will the investigating investigator verify and document the matter, other than inquiring from the highest relevant authority of that collection or its protection (of course, if there is no other solid and documented evidence)?
🔴 آقای ضیا نبوی @ZiaNabavi1 درود
💢 مشکل و آسیب بزرگ در گزارشات نهادهای اطلاعاتی و بطورکلی ضابطان خاص، اینست که غالباً قضات آن گزارشات را وحی مُنزل میدانند و اگر هم ندانند ابزاری برای چک کردن و راستی آزمایی از آنها نیست.
نهایتش اینست که قاضی مربوطه گزارش را به نهاد حفاظت آن… pic.twitter.com/4mnVU146Z7— AbdiMedia - Abdollah Abdi (@abdolah_abdi) August 17, 2025
