Do you know where the problem lies? In cases with lower sensitivity or in instances where the Special Prosecutor's Office for Clergy does not want to accept individuals' files due to national or international consequences, it quickly issues
They are also obligated to address it and do not have the right to object or dispute this decision.
In cases with lower sensitivity or instances in which the Special Clerical Court does not wish to accept the cases of individuals due to their national or international consequences, an order for transfer is promptly issued and the case is referred to the General and Revolutionary Prosecutor's Office or even the Military Prosecutor's Office.
They are also obliged to handle the case and do not have the right to object or dispute this order.
However, the accused individual's case you mentioned, apparently, even though he has seemingly set aside the clerical attire, it is deemed appropriate for it to be handled in that prosecutor's office.
It is obvious that proceedings in the prosecutor's office and even in the Special Clerical Court are practically confidential, and the outcome is also clear, because if that prosecutor's office considered the accusation valid, he would not be serving as CEO now.
📝حجهالسلام جوادی مدیرعامل #ملل؛ یک #آخوند_جاعل است!
او با جعل امضا، هزاران میلیارد پولشویی کرده.
مستندات تخلفش را ۴ سال پیش رسانهای کردم اما چون پرونده در دادسرای ویژه روحانیت پیگیری میشود، هیچ خروجی و نتیجهای مشاهده نشد!
لینک ویدیو کامل برنامه:
https://t.co/5HL7bVU5H1 pic.twitter.com/bzS3sUD7UD— yashar soltani (@yasharsoltani) November 5, 2025
⭕️ درود
مشکل میدانید کجاست؟
💢در پروندههای با حساسیت کمتر یا مواردی که دادسرای ویژه روحانیت پرونده اشخاص را به لحاظ تبعات ملی یا بین المللی آن نمیخواهد بپذیرد، سریعاً قرار #واگذاری صادر و به دادسرای عمومی و انقلاب یا حتی نظامی ارجاع میکند.
📌آنها نیز مکلف به رسیدگی هستند و حق…— AbdiMedia - Abdollah Abdi (@abdolah_abdi) November 6, 2025
