Remarkable points of the indictment of Vahid Haruabadi and the double standard of the judiciary

Abdollah Abdi - Abdi Media

The special prosecutor of Tehran's clergy has issued a punishment for his actions and behavior against the affairs of the clergy by illegally leaving the country in private clothes and hiding in an 18-wheel trailer container and his arrest by law enforcement officers while leaving the country.
And in this regard, Hroubadi has been summoned to the special clergy court for trial.

The accuracy of the accusation and the reference to Article 43 of the regulations of the courts and special courts for the clergy indicate that the prosecutor has asked the court to remove his clerical clothes.

But there are two more strange points in this indictment:

First: He reported the arrest by police officers, but in the text of the indictment, he referred to the report of the Intelligence Organization of the West Azarbaijan Province and the investigation conducted in the special prosecutor's office for the clergy of that area. And it is not clear why this accusation, which happened in that jurisdiction, came from Tehran.

Second: The location of the crime "Tehran" has been announced.

It is clear that such an accusation is considered a crime only for some clerics according to the regulations of this prosecutor's office and court.

But the act committed by Seyyed Ebrahim Raisi was not considered a crime?!!

We know that Ebrahim Raisi was present at the Shanghai summit in a gathering where alcohol was served.

According to Note 3 of Article 11, as well as the definition contained in Article 16 of the Code of Criminal Courts and Special Clergy Courts (regardless of committing the criminal act of participating in the assembly of laho and laib), since there is no defect in the photo and presence of Ebrahim Raisi in that meeting No, the punishment stipulated in the note of Article 18 of this regulation (committing insult to the dignity of the clergy and the revolution), especially since he was a clergyman, a judge, and a special prosecutor for the clergy, and he knew that it was a crime for the clergy; It included his mood.

This is another example of the double standard of the judicial system, when you are connected to the flow of power, they call your haraam halal, and if you are not halal, they call you haraam.