Regardless of the result of the establishment or non-continuation of the establishment of the Islamic Republic; Should the main leadership option after Ayatollah Khamenei be acted in this way?

Read
1 minute
-Tuesday 2026/04/07 - 12:27
News Code:24567
 صرف نظر از نتیجه استقرار یا عدم ادامه استقرار جمهوری اسلامی؛ آیا با گزینه اصلی رهبری بعد از آیت‌الله خامنه‌ای باید اینگونه و به این نحو عمل شود؟

Is it accidental or intentional?  Or is the policy still strangely cruel?

I don't understand that while the members of parliament who are experts in leadership in this war and super-critical situation could have chosen and announced the next leader immediately in other ways than their physical meeting, for example signing the minutes of the agreement meeting for the election of the leader, why should Ayatollah Sheikh Alireza Arafi be publicly elected as a member of the temporary leadership council from among the six current jurists of the Constitutional Guardian Council?

Regardless of the result of the establishment or non-continuation of the establishment of the Islamic Republic;  Should the main leadership option after Ayatollah Khamenei be acted in this way?  Is it accidental or intentional?  Or is the policy still strangely cruel?

The accurate and targeted information that led to the removal of the leader in the first blow and with surgical precision, shows the penetration in the first circle around Ayatollah Khamenei.

Even if a successor is appointed, it is not unlikely that it will be removed in a short time due to the same influence by the Americans and Israelis.

These are the most real moments facing the Islamic Republic after killing its second leader.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up