I invite you once again to refer to all the information exchanged between me and Professor Dr. Burhani's answers, which I also published in Abdi Media, or the answers to some of his respected and noble fans, and read them more carefully

Read
2 minutes
-Saturday 2024/09/28 - 23:50
News Code:2658
دعوت میکنم یک بار دیگر به همه مطالب رد و بدل شده بین من و پاسخ های استاد دکتر برهانی

I would never like to accuse him of being a part of the country's strategically managed security project for the purposeful management of a large part of the citizens' thoughts, ideas and words, which culminated in the university being approved by the regime and in the debate with Sheikh Jalil Mohebi.

But while no lawyer asks the judges of the lower court and the Supreme Court to debate, of course, the language of the lawyer is not this kind, and he asked.

While the fewest university professors and people of culture and art were involved in imprisonment and disciplinary restrictions with the least criticism, no tangible restrictions were ever created for the professor despite all the media rumors.

Rather (with hints), Tehran's Clergy Special Prosecutor's Office did not take any special judicial action despite the filing of a case, as he was a cleric instead of the general prosecutor and the revolution.

The professor never presented his evidence and jurisprudence to the Supreme Court or the courts, either directly or by obtaining representation from the families of the accused, so that the ball is officially in their court, that the Twitter space is not a space for legal challenges, except for a hint.

Even now, when a number of people have been executed and the master of execution considers them to be against Sharia, the Supreme Court of the country has the option of resuming the criminal proceedings to remove the charges against them.

Why officially as a lawyer by obtaining representation from respected survivors? Do they not request a retrial? Or in writing and officially, why didn't they reflect to the Attorney General of the country for his actions, so that the judgment of the court, whether to resume the proceedings or reject it, is exposed to public opinion as a historical document?

I say from the bottom of my heart that I am not happy to write these things; The professor himself is so fair that he knows how worried I was about him; But as if I still have to admit that politics is strangely cruel and rather complicated.

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up