Dear Mr. Farid Modarresi, greetings.

You yourself have attacked me in media groups and attributed to me that I am undermining Ayatollah Khamenei.  

However, for you and your respected colleagues, before the indications and actions of the Ayatollah in those groups, I explained that no crime has been established by Sheikh Kazem for the leader of the Islamic Republic and the relevant judicial authorities, because what is written in cyberspace differs from the reality of Sheikh Kazem and his very specific permits, and I draw your attention to those notes again.  

In the note written at midnight before the Friday prayer led by Sheikh Kazem, I referred to the presence of executive and judicial officials in the initial rows of the prayer, and of course, despite the news received from dear companions, I did not want to name names explicitly.  

After the prayer, I referred to a photo of Sheikh Hossein Rezai alongside Gholamhossein Esmaili without naming him and also mentioned a probable scenario in a subsequent analytical news note.  

But really, do you truly not want to know or point out that the temporary Friday prayer leaders of Tehran are directly appointed and authorized by the Wali-e-Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist) and the "main Friday prayer leader"? Or do you, as always, deny this part and attribute it to the Friday prayer headquarters and other officials?  

And do you really not know that these references are intentional to deny what is being said about Sheikh Kazem in cyberspace and to express the continuity of justice of the temporary Friday prayer leader for the absolute authority of the jurist and the leadership of the community?  

In your opinion, does the special prosecutor for the clergy of Tehran sit in the first row and pray without the permission and indication of the appointed special prosecutor for the clergy and higher authorities?  

I recommend that you or all individuals fighting against corruption, if you have documented information regarding the crimes of Sheikh Kazem, inform the public like Mr. Yashar Soltani or, as an informed citizen, file a complaint or provide an official report to the special prosecutor for the clergy and also inform the public about the results.  

I also recommend that you directly or through the Larijani brothers ask the leader or his office why they still see the continuity of justice in the existence of Sheikh Kazem.  

Wouldn't that be better?