Additional explanations regarding the notification of the "results of the investigation of cases against the master plan and the detailed plan of Omidiye city" by the governor of Khuzestan

The important point is that in the previous term of the Omidiya City Council, the mayor of Omidiya, namely Mohammad Reza Sharifat and Mohammad Reza Aghajari, the head of the Islamic Council of the city, with extensive advertising through numerous appearances on radio and television programs and virtual space, and the production of the Omidiya documentary and its screening. In different cities, addressing the judicial system with large and corrupt costs, and specifically Yusuf Fallahi, the then prosecutor, and many surfers in stimulating the public atmosphere of the city and society, and claiming 26 violations in the process of notifying the city's detailed plan, despite its notification by the then governor with cooperation and support. Habib Aghajari, a member of the Revolutionary Parliament from 1995 to 1403, i.e. about 7 years, tried to stop the implementation of the project.
With the follow-up of Arslan Karimi, the former public prosecutor and the revolution of this city, and the arrival of the Attorney General of the country, as well as the Treasury Protection Council of the Khuzestan Province, and with the expert investigations and meetings of the technical committee and the Article 5 Commission, none of the claims of the named people were approved and only The proposal or personal menus of their corrupt group and spectrum were confirmed.

There is much room for reflection and wonder that how people with their personal taste and view can take the special interests and essential capacities of a city hostage, such as a detailed plan, and in the end, all the expert bodies reject their claims?

What will happen to all that surfing and extensive advertisements on the radio and television, and the numerous screenings of that documentary in the cities and its material and spiritual costs?

What has happened and what will happen to the court case that was filed by the former public prosecutor for this purpose?

By communicating the results of the cases, it is clear that leaving a city and 80,000 citizens undecided for several years is only a sign of influence in violation of legal rights and regulations, and extensive attacks on former and former prosecutors are also a sign of the influence of criminals in parts of the system. has the

Now, it should be seen that the Attorney General of the country will follow up with all these documents and legal cases that have been presented in the judicial authority against some officials as the public prosecutor.