The beginning of a controversial debate from the emir secretary of mehr

Read
1 minute
-Thursday 2024/10/24 - 15:51
News Code:3140
Video file

Amir Debirimehr: If I am Hosseini, I cannot sit in the same place with a tyrannical person and cry for Hossein. 

The problem arises where we use religion as a tool to make up for losses and fill in deficits, especially in the political sphere. 

It is confiscated for political, factional, intellectual purposes and ritual tastes, and this causes discord in society.

There are many concerns that the presence of people in the Muharram ceremony this year is less than in the past. 

This does not mean that these people deviated from their own beliefs, it means that their presence in this ritual constitutes empathy, concurrence, and approval of the views and tastes of the people who are the founders, custodians, and preachers of that ritual. 

People protest and say that Ashura and Muharram and mourning of Hazrat Seyed al-Shahda are a symbol and manifestation of wanting justice, anti-oppression and humiliation. 

How can we go to a delegation with someone who has oppressed others, hit people with batons, insulted people's honor, and mourn with him in a delegation? 

Part of the hot and spectacular debate of Amir Debiri Mehr and Meisam Mahdiar on the topic of "Street religion or religious militancy"

Take less than a minute, register and share your opinion under this post.
Insulting or inciting messages will be deleted.
Sign Up