Inviting reformists to participate in the presidential election causes "ignorance" in society!

* Ahmad Bukharaei: * I had a challenge for about two and a half hours with Dr. Mahmoud Sadeghi, a reformist and former representative of the parliament. As a member of the United Front of Reformists, he defended participation in the elections in favor of Mr. Masoud Mezhekian, and I am against positive participation and advocate "negative activism"! In this debate I addressed these issues: 

1-Analysis of the presidential election of July 8, 1403 from four perspectives: effective cause, formal cause, content cause and ultimate cause. 

2-In explaining the "effective cause" I mentioned the past history and three issues, including: 
A. The unpleasant course of the political system, which has exacerbated the "social collapse" and the crisis of political legitimacy, 
B-the phenomenon of "appointments" in the arrangement of candidates in the last parliamentary and presidential elections, 
P-Rakhmai a "referendum" in the last parliamentary elections in March 1402 with the non-participation of about 60% of citizens. 

In explaining the "formal cause", citing the slogans and propaganda positions of the six current candidates, I noted the "lack of meaningful distinction" between them. 

In the analysis of "content cause" I mentioned four components, including: 
(a) the homogeneity of the candidates' thoughts based on movement on the rails planted politically, economically, socially and culturally, 
B) Candidates' lack of attention to the role of structures in adverse and damaging events, 
P-Intensification of the process of "ignorance" in society by presidential candidates, 
The lack of an expert and in-depth look at nameless phenomena such as: the terrible class divide, the "oil" economy, the intensification of the process of social collapse, the oppressed political prisoners, about eight million immigrants and fugitives far from the homeland, etc. 

5-In drawing the "ultimate cause" I mentioned three things: 
A. All six candidates have no vision of the future that is different from the past. 
B) take a firm position in order to extend the role of intelligence-security forces and the absolute role of leadership in the future, 
They do not have a clear and distinct stance on foreign policy. 

In what society are "elections" few? In a "non-modern" society in which the use of force is carried out in a maximum and widespread form, and instead of the phenomenon of the nation-state, the phenomenon of the nation-state is formed, and the sovereignty is divine, not "national," and the criterion of constitutionality is religious charisma, not "law," and also power is "personal," and its bureaucratic system is "gang," and instead of "citizen," there is "subject." 

7-The keywords of Mr. Masoud Mezshikian in expressing his 3 principles (accountability, goal achievement, accountability) and 5 strategies that all candidates are the same in these keywords. 

8-The united front of reformists has risen to war with "social consciousness" because they do not allow the necessary condition for "social consciousness" i.e. "internal dialogue within individuals" to be formed with the "negative activism" of the members of society, and they also prevent the sufficient condition of "awareness" i.e. turning the attention and opinion of citizens to "examples" instead of "concepts" to be realized because in the past conditions in Iran they have kept society superficial, unaware and "holistic" by repeatedly inviting them to "choose between bad and worse". 

9-The relative participation of Mr. Masoud Mezshikian during his five periods of representation in the parliament and promotion to the level of the first deputy of the parliament in the process of "social collapse". 

Question 3 for Mr. Khamenei: 
A. Why don't they meet and talk to social, cultural, political and economic critics without intermediaries and without security and selectivity? 
B-Wasn't "seeking justice" one of the pillars of the 1357 revolution, and if so, why is society facing an unpleasant class divide and discrimination? 
Q: Why are there so many political prisoners and executions, and why are there violent clashes with critics? 

Please watch and review the video. Thank you